Twelve men

Try and touch base views and values to the subject areas in the school text where you smoke Identifying views and values 1 . Identify three core views that you believe ar expressed through come out Twelve Angry Men 2. Write three sentences astir(predicate) these views using the sample below as a model formal uprises solve challenges the audience to examine their own prejudice, exposing the dangers of prejudging, particularly in the appeal inhabit. 3. What does bloom value / condemn?Identify three qualities/concepts/ideas that you believe Reginald go up endorses, challenges or leaves unquestioned in Twelve Angry Men. Justify your response. 2. put rose wines diarrhoea is all acted on the same set Analyses the imagery created by the map directions at the set outning of the play (Para) Analyses the scenes that take place in the washroom. What is the purpose of this separate section of the stage? In what way(s) does it enable Rose to scram his manpowertions (for exam ple, what is revealed about their motives, attitudes and values etc) as comfortably as our perceptions and responses to them?How does Rose using up the New York skyline to reflect his views on the indifference macrocosm can have to serious situations? (p. -4) What is the effect of the way that Rose marches the action of the play to the control panel room? How does it enable Rose to develop free reintic stresss throughout the play? 3. Characters 1 . Provide slip expound for each of the twelve jurywomans. You can discern to present your details in a comprehensive paragraph on each character, a character map or a chart.You should include any biographical data experiences such as occupation, where they live / grew up the characters personality and role(s) in the play how they feel about the task, their reasons for feeling the boy is guilty (or innocent) their relationships, attitudes and values 3 5 relevant quotations for each character 2. puddle a set back detailing each Jurors views on the guilt of the defendant. Chart how / why these alter over the course of the play Juror When arguinged How swayed Evidence (look at stage directions in particular) 3. Now, discuss Roses view of each character.Is he sympathetic or unsympathetic? Admiring or critical? Affectionate or hostile? How do you know? justify using quotes. Characterization Characters views and values can be revealed through Authorial comments e. G. Hat Rose reveals in the stage directions What the character says themselves How the character spills think specifically about the language the character practices and the noise they use What others say or think about them What the character does How their personalities and attitudes are revealed in their relationships How the characters attitudes and beliefs are challenged by others 1 .Choose three paint moments in the text where Roses portrayal of the character reveals something about their or his own views and values. compend this. 2. F ind 5 stage directions relating to your character and explain their relevance choose stage erections that reveal varied aspects of the character (egg growth over time) 3. Create a word bank for this character 4. Write a terse paragraph on how views and values are aligned with characters in the text.Remember to begin with a evanesce contention, provide explanation (about how the views and values are presented) and digest with evidence from the text. (see example below to help get you started) For example Rose depicts the Juror as a forceful and extremely opinionated man within whom can be detected a streak of sadism. He is hammerless and intolerant, and indeed, his lack of compassion is strongly contrasted to the humanity ND sense of honorable obligation we find in Juror . This reflects Roses criticism of 4. Themes Complete a 200 word compend of each of the themes below for the text as whole.Ensure you utilizes the TEE structure in your analysis Topic Introduce the theme and d iscuss the development of it throughout the text rationalise and Explore fail one or more strong examples from the text to discuss the boilersuit theme e. G. Key events, reflections from Rose etc Evidence Finally, use quotes throughout your analysis to strengthen your discussion. Racial prejudice justice and the Jury rationality and subjectivity ere pressure the power of conformity civic duty(qualities such as honor, compassion, empathy ND the flip side of this insensitivity, ignorance ) 5. Structure and language 1. Rose said No one anywhere ever knows what goes on inside a Jury room but the Jurors, and I thought then that a play taking place entirely within a Jury room might be an exciting and possible moving experience for an audience. controvert in detail the choices Rose makes to engage the audience in the drama of his play to encourage them to reflect on their own prejudices as well as using the court mom to present his views on the brilliance of integrity and active citi zenship. . Plot the tensions of the drama. What are the turning points? Where do they fade? Why? 3. Choose 2 Jurors and study the language patterns and choices. How do they speak to others? What tone(s) do they use? Are their word choices negatively or positively contacted? How does use Rose use their language to influence our reactions to them? Use examples to nominate your discussions. 4. Make a list of 10 stage directions, presented in consequent order, that army what is happening in terms of the physical action of the play. Explain their significance. 5.Make a list of 10 stage directions, presented in sequential order, that show what is happening in terms of the emotional states of the characters in the play. You could choose 1 character or various characters. If you choose one character, do not choose the character that you worked on in the group task. Explain their significance. 6. virtuoso of the key skills of this outcome is the ability to analyses the ways in which text ual import is created. This content being able to identify narrative devices used by authors and the way structural and language elements contribute to a readers understanding of the key textual concerns.Some of the devices include Narrative viewpoint Imagery (similes, metaphors, personification etc) symbolisation / Motif Tone / Mood consider here Roses use of the storm, interactions / tension between characters Setting Colloquial Language Writers use these devices to shape our perceptions of and attitudes towards characters and textual ideas / themes. Find 10 literary devices Rose utilizes throughout the text and explain their meaning. Language / Literary Device (for example, symbol, imagery simile / metaphor, use of cathode-ray oscilloscope etc.Textual Example (Quote) Meaning Created (for egg, how do we perceive character, what does it add to our understanding of theme, neighborly context etc. ) 6. Differing interpretations 1 . For each of the following statements, find exam ples from the text that challenge or endorse the ideas presented discuss why you chose them Twelve Angry Men points up the fact, which too many of us have not taken seriously, of what it means to serve on a Jury when a mans life is at stake. Numbered but not named, the Jurors comprise a cross section of American society Eire value for Rose is as social representatives rather than as individuals. What is uplifting is that Roses narrative shows the ugliness of racial prejudice, and then rational men turning their backs on this ugliness. The racist views do not hold sway for long. Using the themes in the text, develop interpretative statements about the text that link two or more of these ideas in one sentence. For example passim his play, Rose critiques the oppressive and discriminative environment of McCarthy America, exploring the way some Jurors use the power of their rationality to attempt to sway others to share their point of view.Indeed, the eighth juror is aware of the ef fects and dangers of peer pressure and this is illustrated through his pass to have the second (and possibly the most important vote) taken as an anonymous ballot (p. 18) At various moments in the play, the 10th, 3rd and seventh jurors do try to sway the vote to guilty through the use of disincentive rather than argument. What can be interpreted is another clear message conveyed by Rose through his play is that this type of intimidation will ultimately be unsuccessful.Logic and reason do win out over endemic prejudice, but what the play also illustrates is that for this to occur, there must(prenominal) be voices who are prepared to hold true to their convictions. This is clearly envisioned through the contrast between the interrupting and shouting of Jurors 10 and 3 and the calm and reflective pauses of Juror 8. 2. What truths are revealed throughout the play? 3. Identify one character in the text that you are sympathetic towards and one you are critical of. Explain your reactio ns using evidence from the text.